The cost of waiting
Waiting on AI has a cost for a small business. So does rushing in. What the small-business surveys say, and a calmer way to start.
Most owners we talk to ask the same question sooner or later: do I really need to do this now?
It is a fair question. The honest answer has two halves. Waiting has a cost. Rushing in has one too.
Other owners are trying it
Here is what small businesses and contractors report. Each survey below was run or paid for by a company that sells software to them, so read the numbers as a direction rather than a promise.
- Contractors. In a 2026 survey of 1,032 contractors, 12% had built AI into their operations and 34% were trying it out. Two in three expected AI to change their trade moderately or a lot within one to three years.1
- Small businesses. In a survey of 3,350 leaders at businesses of up to 200 people, 83% of growing businesses were using or trying AI, against 75% of all the businesses in the survey.2 That does not prove AI made them grow. Growing firms may simply try more new things.
- Results, as owners report them. Among US small businesses that use AI, 78% said it made them more productive. 43% said it increased their revenue, and 2% said it lowered it.3
So most owners are at least trying it. Few have gone all the way.
Using it is not the same as getting paid for it
In a February 2026 survey of 1,256 small businesses, 76% said they use AI. Only 14% said it was fully built into how they run the business.4
That gap is the real story. Buying a tool is easy. Changing how a job gets done is the hard part, and it is where the payoff is.
The owners who got nothing from AI were usually not sitting still. They paid for tools and skipped that step.
What waiting costs, and what rushing costs
Waiting costs you practice. The owners who change one job this year learn what works in their business. They learn it on a small job, while mistakes are cheap. If you wait, you learn the same lessons later.
Rushing costs you money and trust. A tool nobody uses is money spent. Worse, your team remembers the last tool that didn't stick, and the next one gets a colder welcome.
Neither cost is an emergency. Both are real.
A calmer way to start
- Find where the time goes. Count for one week. Calls missed, quotes waiting, the same details typed twice.
- Pick one job. The one that costs you the most time or money. Only one.
- Change that job all the way, then measure it. Write down how long it takes today. Check again in a month.
That is also how we work. A free 45-minute assessment tells you whether we can help, and usually what to fix first. If the fix needs a closer look, we give you one price for that review, before you commit to building anything.
See where you stand — book a free 45-minute business assessment.
-
ServiceTitan, 2026 State of AI in the Trades (2026; n=1,032 commercial and residential contractors across HVAC, plumbing, electrical, roofing, garage door, pest control and commercial landscaping). Published by a software vendor that sells to the trades. "Two in three" is the 66% who expect moderate or major transformation within one to three years. ↩
-
Salesforce, Small & Medium Business Trends Report, 6th Edition (fielded Aug 3 to Sep 16 2024, published Dec 2024; n=3,350 leaders at businesses of up to 200 employees; global). Vendor-commissioned. The 83% and 75% figures measure use or experimentation. ↩
-
Intuit QuickBooks, 2026 AI Impact Report (May 2026; n=34,364 owners across the US, Canada, the UK and Australia over seven waves, Jul 2024 to Jan 2026). Vendor-commissioned. The figures quoted are the US series, for businesses of 0 to 99 employees that use AI; Canada and the UK run a few points lower on productivity. ↩
-
Goldman Sachs 10,000 Small Businesses Voices, small-business AI survey (Feb 2026; n=1,256 participants in the 10,000 Small Businesses program, surveyed by Babson College and David Binder Research). Program participants are growth-minded businesses, so this is not a random sample of small businesses. ↩